← 返回首页

What evidence shows an ageing relative depends on you for food, shelter and clothing in 2026?

The evidence that carries the most weight is the evidence that shows a pattern: bank statements, money transfers and rent receipts are the three document types the Australian Department of Home Affairs names on its Aged Dependent Relative visa (Subclass 114) official page, which also asks for evidence of how long the support has been provided. The dependency itself must have run for at least the three years before the application is made. So the file that reads best is not the fattest one — it is the one where a decision maker can follow one month, then the next, and see the same basic needs being met by the same person.

What does "dependent on you for food, shelter and clothing" actually mean?

It means your relative relies on you — the sponsor who is settled in Australia — for their basic needs, rather than you simply helping out from time to time. The three-year period is measured before the application is lodged, and the Department specifically notes that a person can be dependent because a disability prevents them from working.

Dependency sits alongside several other criteria: being old enough to receive the age pension in Australia, having no partner, an approved sponsorship, health and character requirements, any debt to the Australian Government having been repaid or arranged, and an assurance of support. This article is general information about how those published pieces fit together, not advice tailored to your circumstances — for your own situation, rely on the official information and on a qualified professional.

Which food and grocery records carry the most weight?

Food is the need that produces the most frequent documents, which is exactly why it is useful: frequency is what turns a payment into a pattern.

A single large transfer reads as a gift. A transfer that arrives every month, in an amount roughly matched to a month of eating, reads as upkeep. Naming the purpose on the transfer reference, where the service allows it, costs nothing and removes guesswork later.

How do you prove shelter rather than just a rent payment?

Rent receipts are one of the three documents the Department lists directly, and shelter is usually the largest single item in an ageing relative's budget — which makes it the item a decision maker will look for first.

A rent receipt works hardest when it sits next to two other things: something showing the tenancy is real (the lease or rental agreement), and something showing who actually paid (the transfer from the sponsor, or the sponsor's direct payment to the landlord). A receipt in the relative's name, paid by the sponsor, tells the whole story in one small triangle of paper.

If your relative lives in a home you own or pay for, there may be no rent receipt to produce at all. The equivalent in that situation is whatever shows the housing cost is being met by you rather than by them — the utility accounts, rates and housing-related bills appearing in your payment trail rather than in your relative's.

Where does clothing fit in?

Clothing is named in the criteria alongside food and shelter, but it generates far fewer documents, because it is bought occasionally rather than weekly. Its value is corroborative rather than central: it shows the support reaches the whole of basic living and is not just a housing arrangement.

In practice, clothing shows up as the occasional larger transfer around a change of season, or as receipts from clothing purchases the sponsor paid for directly. Two or three such records a year, sitting inside an otherwise continuous pattern, are enough to make the point. Chasing a receipt for every garment is not what this is about.

How far back should the records go, and how continuous must they be?

At least three years before you apply, and the Department asks separately for evidence of how long the support has been provided — so the timeline is part of the claim, not an afterthought.

Continuity matters more than tidiness. Assume a sponsor who transferred money monthly for two years and then switched to paying the landlord and the grocery supplier directly for the third year. The dependency never stopped; only the paper trail changed shape. That file reads well if both halves are present and a short note explains the switch, and it reads badly if the third year is missing and the last twelve months look like a sudden unexplained burst of support.

Gaps that have an honest explanation — a lump sum covering several months, a period when a sibling filled in and later repaid, a stretch when the relative stayed with the sponsor and needed no rent — are far better than gaps left silent.

What if your relative has some income, or cannot work because of a disability?

The published criterion is about dependence for basic needs. The Department's own page recognises disability that prevents the relative from working as a recognised route into that dependence, so a relative's inability to earn is part of the picture rather than a problem to hide.

Where a relative does have money arriving from another source, that money becomes part of what a decision maker weighs. The sensible approach is to show both sides plainly: what the other income covers, and what it plainly does not. If a small pension pays for incidentals while your transfers cover the rent and the food every month, the records themselves make that argument — provided the other income is disclosed rather than omitted.

Which documents tie the money trail to the right two people?

Money moving between two accounts proves nothing on its own until the relationship and the sponsor's status are established. The Department lists the following for that purpose:

Only certain people can lawfully give immigration assistance on a visa application; the Department's page explains who. Nothing in this article points you towards any particular firm or adviser.

How is the evidence lodged, and what if the Department asks for more?

Subclass 114 is a paper application, made on Form 47OF Application for migration to Australia by other family members, and the applicant must be outside Australia when applying. The first instalment is paid when the application is made, using the online payment function in ImmiAccount — the visa cannot be paid for in person. The application goes by post or courier to the Parent, Child and Other Family Processing Centre in Perth, at the address shown on the form.

Send certified copies only, never originals, and keep a complete copy of the application and supporting documents for your own records. After lodgement, the paper application can be imported into ImmiAccount using the application ID, date of birth and identity document number, which is also where additional documents can be uploaded if the Department asks for them. If a request for further evidence arrives, respond within the deadline stated in that request. Travel to Australia should not be arranged until the grant is received in writing.

Is dependency evidence the same as an assurance of support?

No — they are separate requirements and they are assessed at different times. Dependency evidence is about the past and present: who has been meeting your relative's basic needs for the three years before the application. An assurance of support looks forward, assuring the government that the person will not have to rely on government assistance after entering Australia, and it covers the applicant as well as any family members who come to Australia on the same visa. The Department tells you when the assurance of support is required; you do not need to supply it at the time you lodge your dependency records.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do bank transfers alone prove dependency for Subclass 114?

Bank transfers are one of the three document types the Department names, but they prove payment rather than need. They are strongest when paired with the relative's own bank statements, which show what the money was spent on, and with rent receipts that account for the largest regular cost.

How many years of dependency records do I need before applying?

At least three years before you apply. The Department asks both for evidence of dependence on basic needs such as food, shelter and clothing and for evidence of how long the support has been provided, so the timeline needs to be visible across the whole period.

Should I send original receipts and bank statements?

No. The Department asks for certified copies only and instructs applicants not to send original documents with a paper application. Keep a copy of the completed application and all supporting documents for your own records.

My relative lives in a home I own — do I still need rent receipts?

Rent receipts only exist where rent is actually paid, so the better question is what shows the housing cost is being met by you. Utility accounts, rates and other housing-related bills appearing in your payment trail, rather than in your relative's, serve that purpose.

Can medical or other household costs count as dependency evidence?

The Department's list of bank statements, money transfers and rent receipts is introduced as evidence that "could include" those documents, so it is not a closed list. Records showing other everyday costs you meet on the relative's behalf can sit alongside the core three, so long as they still point back to food, shelter and clothing.

What if there are months with no transfer?

A gap is not automatically fatal, but an unexplained one weakens a three-year timeline. Where support continued in another form — a direct payment to a landlord or supplier, a lump sum covering several months, or a period when the relative stayed with you — include those records and a short note explaining the change.

References